Having collected paper documents, doodles and other artists’ paintings in order to modify, I bought some fabrics such as blankets, sleeping bags and duvets and stretched them onto wooden frames as readymade hi-viz painting grounds.
The second-hand textiles weren’t the freshest, but I liked the idea that the fibers contained physical histories in the form of absorbed spillages, micro-matter and even dna. People had lain under and wrapped themselves in this comfy swaddling, they had dreamed, perspired, farted, worried, cried and made love within these covers, which held memory and residue of human bodies. If these fabrics were analyzed at a forensics lab, what findings would they yield? Perhaps the results could be presented as a kind of portrait.
The fabrics offered an interesting painting problem in terms of how pattern, printed cartoon, zippers and tags might be incorporated into an image. How might one intervene and cohabit this type of surface in terms of painting?
While working on this project, I was given a number of 35mm art slides, which included examples of Renaissance, Baroque and Neo-Classical painting, prompting my Mum to producing a box of family slides which I had not previously seen. I took advanytage of this windfall and began combining the various types of pictorial stuff with the fabric surfaces.
I considered three graphic categories: The image ‘on’ or intrinsic to the stretched fabric, the art history slide, and the family photograph. How might I organize these images of differing register into the same surface that they might coexist? Would the properties of the images begin to have dialogue with each other? Might they suggest the beginnings of a narrative and meaning which could be accessed and participated in by the viewer? And, of course, what role had paint and ‘painterliness’ to play in all this…